In The Spotlight: Is NFV a Solution Looking for a Problem?
Author: Kim Gibbons, Chief Marketing Officer at NetNumber
The desire for OPEX / CAPEX savings is driving carriers to consider implementing NFV and SDN approaches offered by many vendors today. Given the increasing focus on NFV from vendors, press and analysts, and event management firms – the question is reasonable.
In our viewpoint, NFV provides value today where the hardware footprint is oversized for the service provided. Signaling can benefit through the use of COTS hardware as a first step into a flexible and dynamic world.
We see many vendors jumping on the NFV bandwagon by replicating their physical hardware and software layouts into virtual environments. This approach was evident in several vendor presentations during the LTE World Summit. Unfortunately, such an approach does not deliver on the promise of NFV – improving efficiencies, increasing agility, and lowering costs.
If each function is still separate when virtualized, it must be deployed, managed and updated separately. Virtualized chaos is still chaos! This approach does nothing to reduce complexity in the network core. And complexity is a major barrier for carriers that want to change or offer new services quickly.
NetNumber has been virtualizing network functions for 14 years, long before it was the buzzword of the day. Our approach is to provide a software-based, common infrastructure for the virtual delivery of real-time signaling and control, combined with database services. This platform is easily scaled and distributed to the optimum spots in a carrier network. The result is a radically simplified network core.
Perhaps the question industry should be asking is not whether NFV is a solution looking for a problem, but rather, how can we help carriers embrace software-based solutions as key to evolving their core network infrastructure.